|
|
发表于 2009-7-30 15:11:30
|
显示全部楼层
也有道理，可能是琴太破了
主要就是这样的快餐文化对研究也有冲击。我就非常怀疑这样的调查取样结果，因为地铁里很多人压根就没心情去听卖艺的人拉琴。我觉得拉到剧院里去溜一下才准确，但是有心思去欣赏的现代人真不多了，如何说起。
Wes Philips在他的blog还举过一个反例。
http://blog.stereophile.com/wesphillips/just_shoot_me/
For the last eight years, Berger has polled incoming students on their sound preferences—and I don't mean just asking them which format they preferred. He did demos. "Students were asked to judge the quality of a variety of compression methods randomly mixed with uncompressed 44.1 kHz audio. The music examples included both orchestral, jazz and rock music. When I first did this I was expecting to hear preferences for uncompressed audio and expecting to see MP3 (at 128kbps, 160kbps, and 192kbps bit rates) well below other methods (including a proprietary wavelet-based approach and AAC). To my surprise, in the rock examples the MP3 at 128kbps was preferred. I repeated the experiment over six years and found the preference for MP3— particularly in music with high energy (cymbal crashes, brass hits, etc) rising over time."
Professor Berger says it's all in the "sizzle," by which I take it he means the sounds of dynamic compression and the (to me) annoying glaze of lossily compressed formats. Berger points out that it's what his students are used to—and therefore expect.
斯坦福大学的音乐系教授给学生们播放mp3和无损的录音，结果学生更喜欢128k的录音。。。请注意，这些都是音乐系的学生，对声音应该更敏感的。 |
|
所以，也有可能仅仅是“心理康复”得更快罢了。。
楼主
