|

楼主 |
发表于 2013-1-19 20:50:34
|
显示全部楼层
我发现坛子里很多烧友还是有点“爱屋及乌”的。
说穿了,Tyr1的亮点就在于DMFF(双重微空间绝缘),这个技术Heimdall1和Frey1都是没有的。加之Tyr1的线径比前两者都还粗, 4x24awg。
而以Paul所说,norse 2代全系列都使用了DMFF技术,并且在其他方面有些提高的话,那么根据nordost的档次划分,就可以凭线径参数来大致定级别。
HEIMDALL2用的是4x24awg,和Tyr1完全一样,所以其声音达到TYR1的水平是完全合逻辑的。
FREY2和TYR2则使用了更多的24awg,因此从现有公开的数据上看它们的表现好于TYR1也应该是合乎逻辑的。
The Frey 2 will most definitely sound better than the Tyr 1. They both use DMMF technology but more importantly we have designed a better conductor construction, new proprietary connector, and implemented asymmetrical grounding vs. symmetrical grounding as used in Tyr 1. All of these new advancements in technology have allowed the newer Norse 2 series to surpass the older series. The new Heimdall 2 will outperform the Tyr 1. The Frey 2 is leaps and bounds better than the Tyr 1. Now when comparing the Frey 2 vs. Tyr 2 the Tyr 2 is a huge sonic difference compared to the Frey 2. The Tyr 2 offers more layering to the music and a wider, taller and deeper soundstage with greater frequency range extension. I would recommend that you try all 3 Norse 2 series cables in your system to compare the differences in performance to best match your budget.
Kind regards,
Paul Ritchotte
Technical Support
[ 本帖最后由 chaisan 于 2013-1-19 20:59 编辑 ] |
|