|
|
发表于 2019-4-19 17:13:30
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 哇哇哇 于 2019-4-19 17:17 编辑
还是在这我给你留言吧，不知道为什么私人消息非常卡，常常打不开。
212搭配281还行吧，281是我第一台万元级别的台式耳放，当时的印象就是hd800s终于推开了，281是典型的监听声，中正无染，不冷不暖，声场是有规模感的，能感受到边界而不是无边蔓延的，难得的是声底非常干净，安定感不错。我听说281在几个万元左右的监听耳放里是最水润的，比金牛座，百事通，spl的耳放要水润些，不会过于直白（我买的时候这些耳放还都是万元极），另外就是增益选择很多，高低阻通吃。281现在在万元还站得住脚就反应了它的实力了，但是也就如此了，对比下来还是430ha更适合hd800s。放一张当年的合影。
关于212se的，我在国外the absolute sound里发现一篇关于212的文章，里面提到了dac的设置：
The one menu you should definitely become familiar with is titled “DAC,” and its sub-menus allow the user to tweak all of the ES9018’s settings. In particular, two settings definitely worth experimenting with are the digital filter roll-off (Fast or Slow) and the quantizer bit depth. The ES9018 is a multi-bit sigma-delta DAC, and although a quantizer setting of 6 is considered to be default, settings of 7, 8, and 9 are also available. (I was told that Qsize of 9 is being discontinued as an option, and it certainly did not work on my unit.) Theoretically, the main benefit of increasing the quantizer size is that of reduced high-frequency noise in the audible bandwidth. Strangely enough, a Qsize setting of 8 turned out to be quite noisy, so the real choice was between 6 and 7. I quickly zeroed in on 7 as my favorite, which sounded livelier, with better rhythmic drive. For the record, most of my critical listening was conducted with the Slow filter setting and a Qsize of 7. Out of curiosity, I asked the factory about any testing they may have done to identify measurable differences between these two settings. The Audio Precision tests they undertook, including input-output linearity, failed to identify any clear differences. Perhaps not surprising, since measurements rarely capture perceptual nuances experienced by audiophiles.
中间一大段无关，直接到结论。。。。。。。
If someone had told me a few months ago that I would be embracing a sigma-delta DAC I would have thrown a couple of spuds at them. But keep in mind that in my experience there’s a narrow path toward optimal sound, which involves selection of the slow roll-off filter and a Qsize setting of 7. So configured, I find the DiDit 212se to be enormously compelling musically, so much so, that it is currently my favorite DAC/pre. Make no mistake about it, this is a major endorsement by a reviewer who was for years dogmatically attached to R2R DACs. I think I’ll be taking my dogma out for a walk about now. Be sure to give it a listen. I think that you’ll be as amazed as I was by the musical prowess of the 212se.
这个作者认为slow roll filter and a Qsize setting of 7最好听的，而机子默认的好像是fast 和6.
你有什么调整的经验吗？
|
-
|
楼主
