mobidick 发表于 2016-2-16 19:18
按照上下文，你上面说的“10寸有源最近听了”的“有源”后面应该有一个句号？这个10寸有源你打算搞？
有源后面应该有个回车……被吃了
amex 发表于 2016-2-16 19:34
有源后面应该有个回车……被吃了
你前面提到加炮的话一般都考虑官配炮
那mm45用家岂不是很憋屈，barefoot看样子不会出单独的炮
mobidick 发表于 2016-2-16 23:33
你前面提到加炮的话一般都考虑官配炮
那mm45用家岂不是很憋屈，barefoot看样子不会出单独的炮
有的啊
amex 发表于 2016-2-16 16:08
你觉得这么大的箱子推好了吊打5寸小书架不正常么？
看了一下国外的评价，magnepan没低频，是真的吗
哦还有，我找到一个赚钱的方法，官网上写着，如果买了mg1.7不满意，在一个月内要退货，他们主动赔100刀给买家
mobidick 发表于 2016-2-18 20:31
看了一下国外的评价，magnepan没低频，是真的吗
哦还有，我找到一个赚钱的方法，官网上写着，如果买了 ...
你别搞笑……你这样搞最后人家弄个不退中国人的歧视条款
屏风低频冲击力比较弱，然而下潜和质量都是很好的
没低频说明驱动不匹配
amex 发表于 2016-2-17 00:26
有的啊
没找到barefoot有炮....
在听SC205，准备上官炮le
其实本来还有个想法，就是换成KS D606
其实低音炮反而对房间内搞好低音有帮助，可以随便摆位调整
xdwdycdbs 发表于 2016-2-18 22:47
在听SC205，准备上官炮le
其实本来还有个想法，就是换成KS D606
如果箱子的参数没法下潜到20Hz，我心里都不踏实
mobidick 发表于 2016-2-18 22:37
没找到barefoot有炮....
没在官网单独列出来，但实际上是有的
27和12都有配套炮，见过用家的图
可能要定吧
mobidick 发表于 2016-2-18 23:13
如果箱子的参数没法下潜到20Hz，我心里都不踏实
40（+-2）其实已经差不多了，一般音乐只有极少数情况会出现30以下的频率
本帖最后由 njhifi 于 2016-2-19 11:08 编辑
amex 发表于 2016-2-16 14:30
相对来说D系列的更大型号可以考虑试试，因为d60的问题主要来自于不够大
然而c系列如果都是c5那个风格我 ...
参考一下外网的评价，做个搬运工把它搬过来：
I´ve been using the c55 for about three months now. First I borrowed them from a good friend and compared them to my old M-Audio speakers. Then I went to the Thomann-Store (yes i´ve actually been there) and compared them to several other loudspeakers in the pricerange around 800
奇怪，贴不完整，贴下面这部分看看是否可以，这是主要内容了。
At Thomann I compared them to the c5 tinys, the neumann kh 120, the focal solo 6 be and the dynaudio bm6 MKIII. I also heared the Neumann kh 310.
My impression was as follows (My test was around two hours long and it is already two weeks ago so I recall just from memory and everything is absolutely subjective):
KH 120: very impressive bass for the size, but a little boomy around 200hz and maybe around 800
Focal solo 6be: a little underwelming as they have nice lower mids but lack some bass and are kind of dull in the highend, maybe the examples at the store did not have the "burn in time" that everybody always speaks about but I did not whant to mess around with that matter, they clearly lost in that comperisson
dynaudio bm6 MKIII: a little muddy all over the place and did not translate the area around 8k very well, to me they where a little unimpressive
c5 tiny: I liked the midrange much better than the midrange of the kh 120, especially the upper mids but they sounded literally a little tiny, although they are basically the upper half of the c55 they lack a lot in the bass and are not as clear as the c55 overall
neumann kh 310: I did not listen too much into the big neumanns because they where far beyond my buget but my impression was that they where most compareble to the c55 in the test. As far as I remember they sounded more expansiv, clearer at 500hz and above and though the stereo image of the c55 (and c5) is very impressive, the kh 310 where a lot better there too.
Always remember: These are just my impressions, yours may vary a lot https://static.gearslutz.com/board/images/smilies/wink.gif
还有补充说明，一起贴。
Hey Monitorlove,
to me the c55 had even more detail than all of the speakers in the test but the kh 310. I had a big Rock mix with me in the store and it sounded more powerfull and clear on the c55 than on any other system (but the kh 310).
My impression of the kh120 was that they would propably fit better to a HipHop or EDM producer thant to me. The boomynes in the Midrange made them cover a lot of information there.
As I tryed to say I´m not that sure aboute the focals as they are praised everywhere. I personaly did not hear that much praise-worthy in them as they where kind of dull and I would propably mix very harsh cymbals on them.Maybe the particular pair I listend to did not have the recomended "burn in time".
As far as translation I did not finish any mixes in the time I own my own pair but I can say that the area around 8k is much more revealing on the c55 than on my M-Audios (which is definately a unfair comparison) I know that because that area sounds much less harsh in my car on my newer (unfinished) mixes. Adiddionally I can mix the low end much more reliable on the c55 than on my old M-Audios I still have some problems due to my room but it already got better.
Additional basstraps are going to be build in the upcoming holiday season
Why don´t you compare the c55 yourselve Monitorlove, I think they are absolutely worth it
这个老兄balabala了不少，基本把几个热门低价位的监听箱子比较了一遍。结论是KH310是最牛的。
amex 发表于 2016-2-18 21:47
你别搞笑……你这样搞最后人家弄个不退中国人的歧视条款
屏风低频冲击力比较弱，然而下潜和质量都是很好 ...
要冲击力貌似可以加一个magnepan的炮，官网说可以当椅子做在上面（那儿的照片就有一个mm坐在上面），极限是28Hz
njhifi 发表于 2016-2-19 11:05
这个老兄balabala了不少，基本把几个热门低价位的监听箱子比较了一遍。结论是KH310是最牛的。
但是kh310又会被mg1.7吊打....
