Praga的乌龙盘
praga发行的Mravinsky指挥列宁格勒的Schubert: Symphony # 8 - Unfinished; Tchaikovsky: Symphony # 4其中所谓1959的现场柴4与DG发行的1960柴4是同一场录音，不过praga的音调稍高。后来日本Mravinsky协会发现了这个问题，再后来有人向praga求证，praga说这是小日本蓄意抹黑，总之各种欢乐。美亚有人贴出了考据方法
http://www.amazon.com/Schubert-Symphony-Unfinished-Tchaikovsky/dp/B001Q8UOHO/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top?ie=UTF8
回到praga，“借”别厂录音也不是第一回了，哈哈。不知最近富特的琉森贝九会是什么来路？
://bbs.headphoneclub.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=243285&highlight=%CD%C6%BC%F6
我蛮早就写过这张碟的趣事 是的:lol，praga狡辩走不动的原因在于不仅借了dg的录音，还安上一个59年现场的名头。
同样地方出现同样特征噪音，每个乐章时间等比例相差，足以证明是一个录音吧。不过可能Praga被提供资源的人蒙了。未必有意欺骗。 不太懂，来学习学习。 I'm sorry that my analysis doesn't meet your standards. I'd suggest you invest in the Praga and the DG recordings and find out for yourself. By the way, the Schubert Eighth is also a fake; it's actually a performance from 1978 that can be obtained on a Melodiya CD, coupled with the Sibelius Seventh. (Search Amazon for "Mravinsky Schubert Sibelius" and you will find it.) Once again, as with the Tchaikovsky, one can determine that they are the same recordings by the existence of exactly the same extraneous noises and exactly the same relative difference in the durations of the movements. The Praga transfers are sharp for both the Tchaikovsky and the Schubert. Go for the DG and Melodiya instead to get correctly pitched versions of these performances.
页:
[1]
