...2支 fuse......... 原帖由 brobilly 于 2011-10-17 13:10 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gif 看看能不能砸锅卖铁攒出5000刀, 就能买G08+DARKSTAR了
暗星声音真的很好, 第一天是G08接的, 已经很惊艳了, 算是听过最好的HE6. 我猜如果EF6能够坚持HE6的风格作调整，配G08大概也不会差呢:Q
回复 286# 的帖子
左右声道连电源都是独立的吧？ 原帖由 t1174 于 2011-10-17 13:15 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gifhttp://www.headamp.com/bhse/bhse_back.jpg
...2支 fuse.........
看来电压不可调啊 應該不可, 不過真是求求 Justin 唔好 set 錯...... 原帖由 sentence 于 2011-10-17 13:19 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gif看来电压不可调啊 不一定，见过电压选择开关作在内部的机器，实在不行反正也是定做的机器，叫它用220v的牛就好了:victory: HE-6本身高频就是华美高解析的类型，因此我们不太敢把EF6的高频做的太亮，否则难以搭配音源。而Ray的风格比hifiman团队一贯追求的声音要稍硬和亮一些，或者说音响性好一些。g08的模拟部分用柔美的275运放线路，声音偏柔，下盘也不够结实，和Ray的风格搭配起来口味倒是能偏现代一些。因此口味比较偏90后高音响性器材的玩家玩EF6可以用些meridian之外的音源，比如wadia。 原帖由 冰冰鱼 于 2011-10-17 13:16 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gif我猜如果EF6能够坚持HE6的风格作调整，配G08大概也不会差呢:Q
早上问RAY借了508搭配EF6
如果BUDGET紧缺的话 EF6是最好的选择
但我更喜欢平衡的感觉 EF6没有平衡啊.... 原帖由 冰冰鱼 于 2011-10-17 13:22 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gif
不一定，见过电压选择开关作在内部的机器，实在不行反正也是定做的机器，叫它用220v的牛就好了:victory:
以美國人的性質, 我種是感覺有錯的機會~~ 原帖由 南开米饭 于 2011-10-17 13:24 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gifHE-6本身高频就是华美高解析的类型，因此我们不太敢把EF6的高频做的太亮，否则难以搭配音源。而Ray的风格比hifiman团队一贯追求的声音要稍硬和亮一些，或者说音响性好一些。g08的模拟部分用柔美的275运放线路，声音偏 ...
EF6高频是很亮, 特别是配pinnacle. 原帖由 t1174 于 2011-10-17 13:26 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gif以美國人的性質, 我種是感覺有錯的機會~~ :handshake:lol 原帖由 blankdisc 于 2011-10-17 12:31 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gif嗨, Billy, 跟你说了认真干什么啦...随便嘛...我们弄出来也是就是给大家娱乐娱乐, 看得开心了, 能捧个场, 我们也开心,毕竟从早上7点起床到晚上10点回酒店, 基本就是站一天, 还到处跑来跑去听这个那个, Billy为了 ...
Jude:
Speaking of über-performance, the Audeze LCD-3 is quite possibly the best dynamic headphone ever, to my ears.Whereas the best Sennheiser HD 800 rigs I've heard have--in my opinion, to my ears--trumped even the best I could wring from the likes of the HiFiMAN HE-6, HE-500, and Audeze LCD-2, the new LCD-3 isnow my new top dynamic headphone choice.And, frankly, I'm going to see if I can side-by-side it with the Stax SR-009 here, not because I'm expecting it to necessarily beat the SR-009, but because I think this is one headphone that could give it a run.I already know there are some things it does better than the electrostatic headphone I've called my personal choice for best in the world.
Lest you think I've formed this impression in louder-than-ideal meet conditions, I want to make clear that I've absconded with the LCD-3 to my hotel room for two nights in a row, in addition to meet listening.I have now had two nearly sleepless nights with the Audeze LCD-3 balanced out of my favorite full-size-headphone-driving portable rig, consisting of iPod-->Cyper Labs Algorhythm Solo-->Ray Samuels SR-71b, driving the Audeze LCD-3 balanced via a Moon Audio Silver Dragon headphone cable.I missed dinner my first night here (and so had to make a late-night fast food run), and ordered in room service last night--and, again, I've hardly slept.Yes, I've been listening a lot.
I know--the LCD-3 looks like a modified LCD-2.It is not that.It's not just prettier wood and super-soft earpads.It's a whole new driver.The diaphragm is a lot lighter than the LCD-2's.The magnet structure is new.It has a sound that LCD-2 aficionados might call familial, but the performance is no doubt better, in every respect, to my ears.Simply put, you buy the LCD-2 and you get the LCD-2 (an outstanding headphone, by any measure).You buy the LCD-3, you get the LCD-3.I'm a guy who's purchased four LCD-2's (two rev 1's and two rev 2's), so I think I can say this with some amount of credence.
Starting with the bass, the impact and detail is simply otherworldly, and especially where I can't imagine even the SR-009 trumping it.One of Drew Baird's favorite test tracks is "Company" from Patricia Barber's Modern Cool album, and we were both simply floored by the LCD-3's physicality with Michael Arnopol's bass and Mark Walker's drums.No other headphone I can think of can wring this level of tremendous low-end corporeality without bloat--the sense of this wrung not only from energy, butdetail.When you sense the finest of textures and timbre down low, combined with this driver's clear ability to convey physical impact...well, that's just standard-setting bass to my ears.
LCD-3 midrange performance is similarly stellar, with hints of bloom, but never unnatural, never exaggerated.And the treble soars, delicate, shimmering, extended.Whereas some thought the LCD-2 (rev 1) treble needed some lift and more presence, I do not expect anyone to level this complaint at the LCD-3.Throughout the audible range, the LCD-3 trumps the LCD-2 (and just about everything else) in terms of sheer detail retrieval, so its timbral accuracy throughout is freaky good.And it does all this in sibilance- and harshness-free Audeze fashion.
Am I buying one?What do you think?I can't imagine I'll be leaving this show without one, even if it takes an act of larceny to make it happen (which is essentially what I've now committed two nights in a row).
不再争执。反正什么人，说过什么话，我看在眼里。
你们两个辛苦了，感谢你们在这里为大家报道。
回复 293# 的帖子
其实吧，我倒并不是很看重是不是平衡，虽然手边的东西都是全平衡设计的，只有平衡才能彻底发挥；但真是有专为单端设计的东西，声音一样很赞。我静电一套就打算搞单端的呢:victory: :) 原帖由 pigwave 于 2011-10-17 13:30 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gifJude:Speaking of über-performance, the Audeze LCD-3 is quite possibly the best dynamic headphone ever, to my ears.Whereas the best Sennheiser HD 800 rigs I've heard have--in my opinion, to my ... 算了 不吵了 LCD3是好耳机.[ 本帖最后由 brobilly 于 2011-10-17 13:40 编辑 ] 原帖由 brobilly 于 2011-10-17 13:32 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gif你还是吃个螃蟹吧整天YY没意思
首先，这副耳机还没开始销售。
其次，2000美金对我来说是一笔很大的数目。
最后，这么大笔数目，就算打算购买，我也一定会先亲自试听，才做决定。
另外，关于LCD2，如果我听信了国内各色人等的言论，一定不会购买。但事实是，在了解这副耳机之前，我已经有幸在一次聚会里领略到它的声音。结果是，经过几个礼拜的挣扎和对比之后，我当时还是下定了决心，排队了三个月，才邮购到这副耳机。
