|
发表于 2013-12-17 11:40:23
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 looke 于 2013-12-17 12:02 编辑
mvw 发表于 2013-12-16 16:44 ![](static/image/common/back.gif)
几天前,一位坛友酒后牢骚,对我说写好的东西矫情,不敢在理科生论坛里发布。我看过之后,发现是一篇描写耳 ...
回M大:从10月开始我就一直关注k812的发售和评论,当然主要还是在head-fi上。最近,head-fi上一位耳机测评达人"Tyll Hertsens"放出k812的频响及各种测试曲线,然后说“I don't think I'll be reviewing them...just not good enough, don't want to bash AKG though.”,大意就是频响看起来不咋地,甚至都不想去听耳机,害怕评论出来给AKG带来负面影响之类。
随后是各种讨论和鬼扯,大都缺乏详细听感的支持。不过有一段描述比较细致的听感摘抄一下(听感来自head-fi的JeWorms)
"From a not so experienced ear.
With 2 hours of listening and compare to HD800s, I felt like K812s go with different presentation of music (laid back? kind of. Maybe not try to grab your attention a lot).
If I were to describe HD800s' presentation, it is more pin point accurate and smaller sound block like scaling a properly set upped pair of hi-fi speakers into your "head stage"(not sound stage).
K812 also has a fairly accurate "head stage"( pin point location at my head but muddled compare to HD800). Sound block is much bigger.
K812s and HD650s have a very similar presentation IMO, except K812 is more neutral compared to HD650's dark sound. They both have big sound block in my "head stage".
K812s' measurement are quite similar to HD650 in terms of square wave response and THD. Objectively, I will say K812 is not even into most high end headphones performance league, but subjectively, I like the presentation of K812 because I like the presentation of HD650. To me its more musical and not too analytical, you can enjoy music with it but for monitoring and recording K712 is better IMO. Worth the money? no, absolutely no. HD650 can get very close performance according to the measurement.(If directly compare the graphs.. I might say HD650 are in the same tier as K812...)
I think a lot people will love K812s' sound, but not at that price.
BTW, HD800 is also overpriced IMO."
还有其他head-fi的玩家预计本周末会收到预订的K812,目测下周就会放出K812和HD800更全面的对比了。 |
|