响应SM总的翻译号召：Head-Fi米豪评论各家旗舰——#37 GRADO: RS1
先开贴，翻译速度比预想的慢了。期间和妹纸聊天，看了最新的行尸走肉刷牙，准备睡觉······:lolLike the RS2, the RS1 features a mahogany ear-cup housing. The RS1'shousings are just slightly larger. The RS1 is a bit warmer sounding than itsless expensive sibling. The sonic superiority of the RS1 is really not thatextreme and, in my opinion, does not seem to justify the $200 price difference. RS1和RS2,一样，都是桃花心木的外壳。RS1的外壳要稍微大一点，声音更加温暖。RS1对RS2的声音优势不是非常大，我觉得，不值得贵200刀。
That said, the RS1 is a very goodsounding headphone. Like the RS2, it excels with rock and metal music. I tendto find myself listening to a lot of progressive rock with the RS1. Since Ifind that the RS1 and RS2 share several of the same sonic characteristics, thisreview will read rather similar to my review of the RS2.
也就是说，RS1是非常棒的耳机。像RS2一样，它擅长摇滚和金属乐，我喜欢用RS1听前卫摇滚。我发现RS1和RS2的声音特质很相似，所以我对RS1的评价看起来会和RS2很像。
I should mention that I own two pairs of RS1. One pair is roughly fiveyears old and was re-terminated by Grado Labs witha Stefan Audio Art balanced Equinox cable. The other pair is considerably newerand has the distinction of being an "RS1i." The manufacturer has usedthis "i" suffix since 2010 in order to distinguish recent models fromolder ones. According to the manufacturer, "i" stands for improved.Unfortunately, I do not notice any distinct sonic differences between the twopairs.我有2只RS1，一只大概有5年历史并且用了某平衡线balabala（天知道讲的是那版本，有人来辨别下么？），另一只是相当新的，2010年的i版。官方说法，i表示improve。不幸的是，我没有注意到什么明显的区别。（为何= =，白版不是说i版是最好的么） STRENGTHS优势FUN TONALITY: The RS1i exhibits a forwardmidrange with quite a bit of extra emphasis in the mid-bass transitionalregion. I would say that the RS1 is even punchier than the RS2. Its top end canbe slightly aggressive at times. The RS1 offers slightly better treble extension than the RS2.牛逼的调音：RS1i中频靠前，在中低频的衔接处有一点额外的加强。我认为RS1比RS2更有个性。它有时会变得富有侵略性。RS1的高频延伸比RS2稍好。
MIDS: The RS1's midrange presentation isnearly identical to the that of RS2's - forward and lively with an emphasis inthe lower mids, adding impact and depth.中频：RS1的中频几乎和RS2一样——靠前，热情，中低频的一点加强凸出了冲击力和深度。
ELECTRIC GUITAR MASTER: Just in caseyou haven't noticed, the review of the RS1 reads almost identically to theRS2's review thus far. This is because the two headphones are remarkablysimilar; they both excel in the same areas. The sonic presentation hereenhances the sound of electric guitars. With respect to the rendering ofelectric guitars, the RS1's mid-bass hump adds significant bottom to the sound,while the upper harmonics (around 6-10 KHz) are brought forward, adding anaggressive three-dimensional quality.
电吉领主：以防你还没注意到，到现在为止，RS1的评价和RS2的看起来一模一样。两幅耳机惊人的相似，他们都擅长同样的领域。他们的声音特性很适合电吉他，有着对电吉他超凡的演绎能力。RS1中低频的突起提供了强大的声底，结合高频泛音的延伸，带来了富有侵略性的三维感。
DECAY: I am a fan of the decay presentation which Grado headphonesoffer. It's not exceptionally fast, yet it is very natural sounding to my ears.瞬态：我是歌德的瞬态粉。对我来说，这并不是异常快的瞬态，而是非常自然的感觉。
EASY TO DRIVE: None of Grado's offerings areparticularly difficult to drive. However, I do recommend using an amp to powerthem. As with the RS2i, I have found that the RS1i sounds the best when it ispaired with the TTVJ Millett 307A.容易驱动：没有一副歌德耳机是难搞的。但我还是推荐二房伺候。和RS2一样，我发现RS1i在TTVJ Millett 307A驱动下最好听。
SERIALIZED: Each RS1 is individuallyserialized. This can be particularly helpful in ascertaining the date ofmanufacture.带编号：每只RS1都有各自的编号。这对鉴别耳机的生产日期有很大的帮助。
WEAKNESSES 弱点COMFORT: I find Grado's on-ear headphonesto be remarkably uncomfortable. Regardless of how loose or tight I adjust theheadband, I never seem to find wearing the RS1 to be a comfortable experience.The ear-cups simply feel awkward on the ears. I've concluded that the shape andtexture of the foam is just not my not for me. Many others have voiced similaropinions to what I express here.
舒适度：我发觉歌德的便携头戴式耳机很伟大的不舒服。无论怎么调整松紧，我从未有过舒服的戴RS1的经历。耳罩的感觉很尴尬。耳机的形状和质感不适合我。很多用家也表达过和我一样的经历。
NOT NEUTRAL: Neutrality-seekers should looksomewhere else. The RS1 offers a very fun tonality, but is far from uncolored.
不中性：追求自然声音的最好找别的耳机。RS1的调音很有趣，但不是无染色的。
CONSTRUCTION: Grado headphones exhibit anultra-simplistic design that fails to impress me on an aesthetic level. While Ido know others who appreciate the home-made look, I haven't yet warmed up toit. I don't believe I ever will. Perhaps if I found the design to be morecomfortable, I would feel differently.外观设计：歌德耳机的极简外观设计不符合我的审美。当一些人欣赏这样手工作坊式的外观时，我从未对其增加半点好感。也许这样的设计能更舒服的话，我可能会接受。
STORAGE: The RS1i ships in a simple whitecardboard box. It resembles a pizza box; not very impressive at all. The boxincludes an internal foam cutout, intended to preserve the headphone fromdamage when in storage.储存：RS1i的包装是一个愚蠢的白盒子。这另人联想到披萨盒；完全没有吸引力。
ON THE FENCE 中庸
TRANSPARENT: I am convinced that none ofGrado's offerings are definitively transparent. However, all of the ones whichI have heard get very close.透明度：我确信没有一副歌德耳机是极其透明的，所有我听过的都差不多。
BASS: The RS1 exhibits a bit more bassimpact than the RS2. Unfortunately, it offers no deeper extension than the RS2.I prefer the RS1's added impact, but the RS2 has a slightly snappier basspresentation.低频：RS1的低频比RS2多了一点冲击力，不幸的是，这没有带来低频延伸的提高。我更喜欢RS1更强的冲击力，但是RS2的低频更活泼一点。 TREBLE: The treble presentation here is abit forward, yet it lacks sparkle up on the very top. Overall, I like thetreble presentation, but I would say that it possesses a very slight grainytexture.高频：RS1的高频延伸更好，但是它在很高的频段缺少闪光点。总的来说，我喜欢这样的高频，但是我会说这，有种非常轻微的颗粒感。 SOUNDSTAGE: The RS1's soundstage presentationis neither wide nor tall. However, it does display a sense of roundness anddepth. I do not find the soundstage presentation of the RS1 to be particularlydifferent from that of the RS2.声场：RS1的声场既不宽又不高。但是，它的包围感和深度不错。我没有发现RS1和RS2的声场有什么特别的不同。 IMAGING: The RS1 is able to insinuate thepositions of instruments, but it doesn't quite zoom in with extreme definition.结像：RS1能够表现出乐器的位置，但是严格来说，它的zoom（收放吗？）并不是很好。
FOR THE PRICE 性价比B-The RS1 has remained in production for more than two decades and,according to many, has taken on several sonic incarnations during this time. Ihave only heard the more recent versions of the RS1. I consider its soundsignature to be ideal for rock and metal music, especially if you prefer anintimate yet aggressive presentation. Those who are in the process of readingthis whole evaluation will notice that my review of the RS1 is nearly identicalto my review of the RS2. The reason for these similarities is that the overalldifferences between the two headphones are not extreme. Yes, the RS1 is abetter, warmer sounding headphone, yet I am not convinced that it is worth $200more.RS1已有20多年历史，期间它有很多不同版本，我只听过最近的版本。我觉得它的声音很适合摇滚和金属，如果你喜欢热情并且有侵略性的声音，它是你的菜。看完整篇的朋友会发现我的评价和RS2的很相似，原因是他们的区别不大。当然，RS1是更好声，更温暖。即使如此，我不认为这值得比RS2贵200刀。 QUICK CHECK 简评·
DESIGN: On-Ear 便携头戴·
DRIVERS: Dynamic
易驱动·
IMPEDANCE: 32 Ohms 32欧·
ISOLATION: Little to None 几乎不隔音·
AMPLIFICATION: Recommended 推荐上二房·
MY PREFERRED AMP: TTVJ Millett 307A 我偏爱的二房：TTVJ Millett 307A·
SOUNDS BEST WITH: Electric Guitar / Rock /Metal / Blues 擅长电吉他，摇滚，金属，布鲁斯·
CABLES USED: Stock / Stefan Audio ArtEquinox Balanced (dual 3-pin)
原线/ Stefan Audio Art Equinox三针平衡·
REVISIONS KNOWN: Several known to me 有数个版本·
FLAGSHIP STATUS: Once Was 曾是旗舰·
PRODUCTION STATUS AS OF 2012: InProduction
在产·
COST: $695 695刀
[ 本帖最后由 rockyroad 于 2012-11-7 00:25 编辑 ] 先坐个沙发 行尸走肉还是前面几部经典 看来RS1的佩戴问题是全世界公认的了。。。 期待PSK的听感，大神们翻译一下哈 这位美老对透明度理解很到位，在他评级的耳机里面透明度都是他不满意的地方，而且像耳机完成度，密闭耳机的不通透，声音中性等方面说的很到位很有参考价值 :loveliness: 歌德的佩戴确实有点嗯哼嗯哼。。。 作者的第一只RS1用的应该是俗称＂E线＂的东西，通常给HD650搭配的比较多。 第一个是说用Stefan Audio ArtEquinox XLR 线改过，似乎还是Grado labs原厂给改的
以前国内讨论的比较多的都是用 Equinox 配 HD600、650，记得是比较适合配600
[ 本帖最后由 flyinghail 于 2012-11-6 10:58 编辑 ] ……… 很伟大的不舒服？
不如说“不舒服的一逼” 不得不说歌德的造型真心不喜欢... 嗯，的确。不过我不习惯怎么说，呵呵。伟大的不舒适度！
原来叫E线啊，谢谢指出
然后，似乎看RS2的评论更有价值···有人翻译么？或许我有空再翻译吧orz。
页:
[1]
