HIFIMAN HM-801播放器和HE-5LE耳机被一本关于耳机和PC音频的日文书收录
http://down.head-direct.com/book.jpghttp://down.head-direct.com/book1.jpg
http://down.head-direct.com/book2.jpg
http://down.head-direct.com/book3.jpg
[ 本帖最后由 南开米饭 于 2010-11-3 11:29 编辑 ] 把801外形做得漂亮点才买 想听听 南开米饭 对发真男人801解剖图的态度
支持 还是反对 还是没意见？
[ 本帖最后由 小白粉丝 于 2010-11-3 12:03 编辑 ] 打架坛评测小组
对HE-5的评测是综合素质低于HD650，米饭怎么看？
[ 本帖最后由 小白粉丝 于 2010-11-3 12:04 编辑 ] Hifiman的问题是这不是一个成系列的产品：
播放器/耳机系统，基本不属于一个风格，水准也高度不一致。
801我很仔细地听过，不考虑稳定性/安全性/适用性，单就音质而言，的确是不错的，声音的素质也远超D50；但是，从上市599美金的定价，之后不到半年涨到799还是899？
我觉得不是市场推广上策略有问题，就是厂方本身的人品有问题：
你究竟是开始时定价定错了？还是试水之后，觉得反响不错，就漫天要价？
幸好，最近价格已见松动；不过厂方估计也已经赚得盆满钵满了！
Hifiman的这套平板耳机，明显是有问题的，不说其质量不够可靠；力大声粗，瞬态不错，但没有特点，缺乏乐感；和Hifiman的播放器完全两种走向，很奇怪，厂方的设计，究竟是拉到篮里就是菜，还是有一个承前启后的延续性的？这套东西，上海安润店放着（靠门柜子的底层）；去听过的人也不少了，给好评的实在不多！
安润毕竟是一个商家，已经代理了的产品，不敢拿出来放在桌上，代表自己实力的，恐怕~~~
[ 本帖最后由 Enlighten 于 2010-11-3 11:53 编辑 ] 版主早啊。感谢夸奖HM-801的音质。感谢顶帖。 另外你对于HE-5LE的说法和TAS老外的测评都完全不同，应该他们都是木耳吧。 原帖由 南开米饭 于 2010-11-3 11:55 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gif
版主早啊。感谢夸奖HM-801的音质。感谢顶帖。 另外你对于HE-5LE的说法和TAS老外的测评都完全不同，应该他们都是木耳吧。
很奇怪哎，小白怎么就是不写这个评测呢？
是给你留个面子，还是怕麻烦？
听感不同？TAS上面有说不好的器材吗？ 大家午安:) 小白不写测评还不是因为您老不喜欢。大家都觉得您老说的都是对的，所以就不写了。
这个外国人说的也不对，所以建议硬总封他ID
http://www.avguide.com/review/hifiman-he-5le-planar-magnetic-headphones-playback-33?page=2HiFiMAN HE-5LE vs. Sennheiser HD650 ($600)
• The Sennheiser HD650 is roughly $100 less expensive than the HE-5LE.
• The HD650 is more compact than the HE-5LE and therefore somewhat more comfortable, though some listeners might prefer the HE-5LE’s significantly larger earcups.
• The HD650 is easier to drive than the HE-5LE, which suggests to me that it could potentially be used successfully with a broader range of amplifiers (though both headphones require good amplifiers to give of their best).
• The HD650 is backed by Sennheiser’s time proven customer support organization, which implies that many years from now spare parts for the HD650 will continue to be available, should you ever need them. As a relatively new company, HiFiMAN’s long-term customer support capabilities are as yet unproven.
• The HD650 offers a lively and articulate sound, and offers decent low frequency response. Relative the HD-5LE, however, the HD650 gives the impression of a somewhat more midrange-forward presentation with slightly truncated response at the frequency extremes.
• Relative to the HD650, the HE-5LE offers superior extension at both high and low frequency extremes (but especially noticeable in the bass region), higher levels of resolution, and a more focused and coherent presentation overall. If your headphone amp is up to the task, the fact is that the HiFiMAN ‘phones offer much greater performance upside than the HD650s do.
至于Chris Martins说HE-5LE比HD800有stronger performance overall
实在是大逆不道，建议硬总将这个外国老头，前TAS编辑五马分尸，凌迟处死。HiFiMAN HE-5LE vs. Sennheiser HD800 ($1595)
• The Sennheiser HD800 costs a whopping $896 more than the HE-5LE.
• The HD800 is essentially a hand made product, and it shows; while apparent build quality on the HE-5LE is fine, the HD800 more nearly reminds me of a Swiss watch.
• The HD800 is easier to drive than the HE-5LE, though again both headphones require high quality amplifiers for optimal performance.
• The same comments I made about Sennheiser’s customer support organization apply here, too.
• The HD800s are, as you might expect, a much closer match for the HE-5LE’s than the HD650s are, and there are some notable similarities between the two. Both headphones offer a dynamically expressive sound with good measure of midrange detail. In back-to-back listening sessions through the same amp and using the same musical selections, however, several important distinctions became apparent between the Sennheiser and HiFiMAN ‘phones.
• First, the HE-5LE enjoys a subtle but clear-cut edge over the HD800 in terms of upper midrange/treble clarity and smoothness. By comparison, the HD800 sounds rougher and less well controlled up high, occasionally imparting a “spitty” or overtly “splashy” quality on sibilant “S” sounds.
• Second, the HiFiMAN sounds more harmonically coherent and all-of-one-piece on many instruments—qualities most easily heard on female voices, plucked guitars, bowed violins, and the like. In contrast, there seem to be very small yet audible textural discontinuities that keep the HD800s from snapping into sharp focus the way the HE-5LE does.
• Third, the HE-5LE offers slightly better low frequency extension and drive than the HD800, though both are markedly better than most competing headphones in this respect.
• Although the comparison is a very close one, I would say the HE-5LE is the stronger performer overall, which is impressive when you consider how good the HD800 is to begin with (many listeners rightly regard as a benchmark product). 原帖由 南开米饭 于 2010-11-3 11:58 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gif
小白不写测评还不是因为您老不喜欢。大家都觉得您老说的都是对的，所以就不写了。
小白没这么优柔吧？
还是你人太烦了，一天去人店里闹三次，人家要做生意，没办法，只好代理你的产品啊？
有些事情嘛，心照不宣即可；说多了，大家看笑话！
;P ;P
[ 本帖最后由 Enlighten 于 2010-11-3 12:11 编辑 ]
stereophile的测评也很快出来，建议硬总磨刀霍霍
硬总一定会成为俱乐部的义和团领袖，消灭洋人 原帖由 Enlighten 于 2010-11-3 12:04 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gif小白没这么优柔吧？
还是你人太烦了，一天去人店里闹三次，人家要做生意，没办法，只好代理你的产品啊？
是啊是啊，我实在是太烦了。谢硬总顶贴。 现在南开米饭分明就是个广告ID！
